|
Dennis O'Brien Speaks
|
|
|
|
John Perzel is a plague on Pennsylvania
|
|
|
|
Incrementalism - A Lie from the Pit of Hell! |
|
|
|
BUSH ADMINISTRATION GRANTS BIG VICTORY TO ABORTION INDUSTRY |
FaxNotes - September 1, 2006
OTC Sale of "Plan B" A Windfall for Planned Parenthood
The July-August edition of The Caleb Report, a publication of Life
Decisions International (http://www.fightpp.org/index.cfm),
an organization that
produces a boycott list of corporations that fund Planned
Parenthood, reveals data on the actual number of customers who were
given "care" in Planned Parenthood clinics nationwide as reported in
the 2003-2004 Planned
Parenthood Federation of America Annual Report.
In 2003, 774,645 customers received "Emergency Birth Control" AKA
"Plan B." In 2004, nearly one million (983,537) customers
availed themselves of that "service." Barr Laboratories, the maker
of "Plan B," sells its one-or-two pill kits to Planned Parenthood
for the "special" price of $4.25 apiece, 25 cents lower than the
discount rate Barr offered to public agencies, reports Diedtra
Henderson, a staff reporter for The Boston Globe. ("Agency takes in
millions in morning-after pill sales," 9/3/05) The kits are usually
sold to consumers for about $30.
In the same year (2003-2004), income from PP clinics generated
$306.2 million. On top of that, Planned Parenthood received $265
million of taxpayer's money through various government grants. Much
of that funding
came through Title X, the Family Planning Services and Population
Research Act of 1970, a bill co-authored by then Texas Congressman
George Herbert Walker Bush and signed into law in 1970 by President
Richard Nixon. Title X
created clinics that offered comprehensive "family planning"
services to low-income women and adolescents. The record shows that
Mr. Bush was a passionate advocate of population control, stating in
1969, "We need to make population and family planning household
words. We need to take the sensationalism out of this topic so that
it can no longer be used by militants who have no real knowledge of
the voluntary nature of the program
but rather are using it as a political steppingstone. If family
planning is anything, it is a public health matter." In 1970,
President Nixon said, "No American woman should be denied access to
family planning assistance because
of her economic condition. I believe, therefore, that we should
establish as a national goal the provision of family planning
services . . . to all who want, but cannot afford them." (Planned
Parenthood Federation of America, October 2003)
President Ronald Reagan, in carrying out the pro-life, conservative
agenda he campaigned on, attempted to dismantle the whole Title X
behemoth and did succeed in placing some significant obstacles in
its path. George H.W. Bush, whose constituency expected him to
carry on the Reagan legacy, did support measures that restricted
funding for and limited access to population control activities in
foreign countries as well as here at home,
and incurred the wrath of his former friends by doing so. But the
monster had already been created-Congress refused to de-fund it-and
the wealthy and powerful pro-abortion interests in both parties
enabled the "family
planning" industry to continue its enormous growth.
Over the years, manufacturers of chemical birth control products
have developed more and more powerful drugs. No longer is the term
"contraceptive" applicable. To contra-cept is to prevent conception
from taking place in the fallopian tube. The issue at hand is the
so-called
"morning after" pill or "Plan B," a drug that, while it can act as a
contraceptive, was developed to intercept a developing human embryo
by preventing his or her implantation in the mother's uterine wall,
causing an
early abortion.
"Plan B" is one of those powerful hormonal drugs, described on
Planned Parenthood's own website as equivalent to taking as many as
40 progesterone birth control pills, which are only available by
prescription. Why then, has the Bush administration backed the
decision by FDA acting director Dr. Andrew Von Eschenbach to allow
it to be sold over-the-counter to anyone over 18 who wants to buy
it? Does it matter that customers under 18 still need a
prescription? Anyone who has followed the activities of Planned
Parenthood, school-based clinics, and other taxpayer-funded "family
planning' agencies over the years would find that laughable.
There is absolutely nothing to prevent an older male, intent on
committing statutory rape, from purchasing the drug and giving it to
an under-age girl with the promise that if she submits to him she
won't get pregnant and no
one will ever know.
The effects of this drug on the physical well-being of teenage girls
whose bodies are still developing are unknown. Who at the FDA or
in the White House cares about that?
What Congressman Bush and President Nixon put into motion 26 years
ago forced the American taxpayer into complicity with personal
behavior many believe to be morally wrong and with population
control policies to which
they object. Today, because of the Bush administration's decision
on "Plan B," millions of Americans who believe that each and every
human life is deserving of respect and protection are being forced
to subsidize chemical abortion.
Just how does that help to build a "culture of life" in America?
Source: Republican National Coalition for Life FaxNotes - September
1, 2006 |
|
CRISIS IN STATE GOVERNMENT |
A Story of Emerging Tyranny
by William Depner, 8/31/06
A judge on the U.S. Supreme Court wrote that the Ten
Commandments could not be posted in public schools because students
might read them, think about and ultimately obey them. Thus
judicial tyrants in black robes ruled that it would be an
impermissible religious purpose to teach public school students the
commandment “You shall not murder”. The bitter fruit is that today,
instead of the Ten Commandments, there are metal detectors, security
guards in the schools and an epidemic of murders paraded across the
news every day, a growing danger to everyone.
As Christians shrink back from moral law and civic duty, state
government and courts are also becoming populated with unprincipled
tyrants. We are increasingly experiencing their havoc and the
demise of the justice and morals that are necessary for personal and
societal stability.
During the Industrial Revolution following the Civil War,
growth in the corporate form of business organization led to
concentrations of wealth and the corruption of legislators for
special laws, log rolling and favoritism. The PA Constitutional
Convention of 1872-73 convened to reform such corrupt legislative
behavior. The state constitution was amended by Article III, para.
3 to state: “No bill shall be passed containing more than one
subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title.”
The original bill that became Gov. Rendell’s massive slots
bill, Act 71, was only one page long and entitled: “An Act Providing
for the Duties of the Pennsylvania State Police Regarding Criminal
History Background Reports for Persons Participating in Harness
Horse Racing.” Without public hearings or input, a comprehensive
slot machine bill (Act 71) emerged from this 1-page bill with wide
ranging topics and far reaching consequences. Act 71 created a
Pennsylvania (Gambling) Control Board, the issuance of gambling
licenses authorizing the creation of a variety of slot machine
casinos, the generation and distribution of revenues from the
licenses, the creation of numerous funds including the (Gambling)
Fund, the Pennsylvania Horse Race Fund, the Gambling and Economic
and
Tourism Fund, the Property Tax Relief Fund and even a Compulsive and
Problem Gambling Treatment Fund for the people they would make sick
by gambling! Act 71 also replaced government investigative and
police powers with a independent “gambling commission” that controls
all investigations of itself and of gambling, thus giving gambling
interests exactly what they want. Organized
crime cannot be faraway. Without public hearings or debate, the
bill authorized 61,000 highly addictive slot machines, more than any
state except Nevada, which will profoundly corrupt public morals and
let gambling interests and organized crime control state government.
PA SUPREME COURT: RUBBER STAMP FOR TYRANNY
In 2005, the PA Supreme Court ruled on a legal challenge that the
slots bill had violated the single purpose provision of Art. III
of the Pennsylvania Constitution. The Court ignored both the intent
and the letter of Article III, whose purpose was to prevent special
interests from ramming their projects through the legislature, and
upheld the gambling bill that Gov.Rendell and the gambling interests
had just rammed through the legislature! Some things never change.
Act 72 was a plan of Gov. Rendell to use gambling revenues to
lower property taxes in local school districts, deepening the
state’s dependence on gambling. However, in an unforeseen
development, an overwhelming majority of the local school boards
rejected the gambling revenue from the state which would diminish
their control.
Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Like a
king or supreme court justice, Gov. Rendell threatened to call for a
special session of the legislature and demanded that legislators
force local school districts to accept the gambling lucre. He said
it was a flawed concept in the first place to allow school districts
to vote on accepting gambling money. He threatened to call special
sessions of the legislature until the legislators enacted property
tax relief. In contempt for both government by the People and for
the rule of law, Gov. Rendell said that neither the local school
boards nor the People should be permitted to vote on it.
All of the foregoing should be no wonder. The founding fathers
said it was impossible to govern without God and the bible, but Gov.
Rendell manifestly despises the Ten Commandments. He is unashamedly
pro-abortion of the unborn. In a Sunday Harrisburg Patriot-News
article, Rendell spokesman Chuck Ardo indicated that the governor
believes that the courts should define marriage. |
|
Abortion Images Incite
Opinion |
BY JEFF SONDERMAN
08/23/2006
The Rev. Kathryn Simmons instinctively glanced up as two trucks
rumbled past her Tuesday morning on Washington Avenue.
"What is that?" asked the Rev. Simmons, a minister at Bethel AME
church.
Her curiosity gave way to shock as her brain registered the
8-by-22-feet images painted on the sides of the trucks: bloody,
aborted fetuses.
"That is disgusting."
Others will probably share her opinion as the four trucks patrol
downtown Scranton and Wilkes-Barre for about three weeks,
occasionally supported by an airplane towing a 35-by-100-feet
banner.
It is part of a campaign intended to shock unsuspecting people with
the up-close reality of abortion, said organizer Mark Harrington,
the executive director of the midwest office of the Center for
Bio-Ethical Reform, an anti-abortion rights group based in Lake
Forest, Calif.
Mr. Harrington said he doesn't understand how those who support
abortion rights "get angry at the pictures, but they don't get angry
at abortion."
The Rev. Simmons, who believes abortion is an issue "between a woman
and God," said pictures won't change her mind.
"Basically, that just scares you to death," she said.
Down the street, 44-year-old Scranton resident Barbara Panetti said
she didn't like that people are being publicly confronted with these
images with no warning.
"It is too graphic, especially with children around," said Ms.
Panetti, grateful that her 9-year-old son was not with her. "To show
that on the streets, I don't think that is appropriate."
The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform's campaign has been in other parts
of the U.S. since 2001, Mr. Harrington said, but came newly to
Pennsylvania this year to raise the abortion issue among voters in
key November elections for
the state's governorship and a U.S. Senate seat.
Since June, the images have rolled through Philadelphia, Pittsburgh,
Harrisburg, Allentown, State College, Altoona and Erie.
In every city, they have drawn controversy, which is precisely their
goal.
Mr. Harrington compares his aborted fetus pictures to other gripping
images that shifted social conscience toward civil rights or away
from the Vietnam
War.
The power of such images is "indispensable in social reform," he
said.
"People may initially have an angry response, but they are never
going to be able to get these pictures out of their heads," Mr.
Harrington said.
Displaying bloody reality is the main trade of the Center for
Bio-Ethical Reform.
The group's Web site,
www.abortionno.org, calls abortion "genocide," and features
"extremely graphic" videos of abortions in progress and of aborted
fetal tissue.
The extremist approach may go too far even for some religious
leaders who oppose abortion rights, but also believe in compassion.
"They make the assumption that they know what God is thinking, and I
never make that assumption," said the Rev. Donald Anderson, pastor
of Clarks Summit United Methodist Church.
"What we try to do is live out the wholeness of the gospel, which is
compassion and understanding for people caught in unwanted
pregnancies," he said.
Gruesome images, though, can serve a purpose, said the Rev. Mark
Schmitz, pastor of Summit Baptist Bible Church in Clarks Summit.
He recalled his childhood affinity for motorcycles that was tempered
when he saw photos of a horrible motorcycle accident that claimed a
rider without a
helmet.
The Rev. Schmitz still rode motorcycles later in his life, but less
often and always with a helmet.
The abortion photos could have the same effect, he said.
"What they are trying to do is help people to face a reality that,
unless they go into an operating room, they will never be able to
understand," said the Rev. Schmitz, who opposes abortion rights.
"It is not a very culturally comfortable thing," the Rev. Schmitz
said. "We live in an age where seeing reality happen is too much for
our taste."
Contact the writer:
jsonderman@timesshamrock.com
CThe Times-Tribune 2006
Source:
http://tinyurl.com/s822b |
|
Priests for Life Urges Partial-Birth Abortion Educational Activity |
WASHINGTON, Aug. 18 /Christian Newswire/ -- Now that the Supreme
Court has set the date (Wednesday, November 8) for oral arguments in
Gonzales v. Carhart and Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood, the two
cases related to the federal ban on partial-birth abortion, Fr.
Frank Pavone, National Director of Priests for Life, has called for
increased public education about this procedure.
“Despite the fact that this procedure, by which a child is partially
delivered and then killed with scissors in the back of the neck, has
gotten national attention for over a decade, there still aren’t
enough Americans who know about it. As people do learn what it is,
they re-evaluate the whole idea of ‘pro- choice’ and ‘Roe v. Wade,’
because they never imagined either of those terms connected with
such a brutal and repulsive procedure,” Fr. Pavone explained. “In
the months to come we will intensify our efforts to reveal the ugly
face of ‘pro-choice’ by exposing this procedure, and we call on
pastors and other organizations to do the same.”
Priests for Life is the nation's largest Catholic pro-life
organization dedicated to ending abortion and euthanasia. For more
information, visit
www.priestsforlife.org. |
|
Pennsylvania Court Backs Rendell Veto on Family Planning-Abortion
Funds |
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
August 14, 2006
Harrisburg, PA (LifeNews.com) -- A Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court
panel ruled 5-0 in favor of a line-item veto by Gov. Ed Rendell of
language in the state budget saying that the $8.8 million allocated
to family planning cannot go to any agency that does abortions or
refers women to abortion businesses. Rendell, a pro-abortion
Democrat removed the pro-life provision from the budget. The state
legislature approved the budget and the family planning provision
last year to make sure no federal family planning monies were
funneled through the state Department of Public Welfare to fund
abortions.
The legislature has subjected state family planning funds to the
provision since 1996, when it adopted a law saying the state money
"shall not be used to promote, perform or refer for abortions, or
engage in abortion counseling."
But Rendell claimed putting the provision on federal family planning
funds the state receives would have violated the state constitution
and federal law. He also said he thought the provision would end up
costing the state between $18 million and $27 million in federal
funds.
In September 2005, State House Speaker John Perzel and State Senate
President Pro Tempore Robert Jubelirer, both Republicans, filed a
lawsuit to uphold the legislature's provision.
However, the judicial panel dismissed the case on Thursday, thus
upholding Rendell's line-item veto.
"The governor's powers of disapproval are no less extensive than,
and are entirely coexistent with, the General Assembly's power to
enact legislation in the first place," President Judge James Gardner
Colins wrote, according to an AP report.
"In other words, if the General Assembly can put it in, the governor
can take it out," Colins added.
The decision said the state legislature should attempt to override
the veto if it disagrees with Rendell's decision rather than
challenging his right to line-item veto the family planning-abortion
provision.
Source:
http://www.lifenews.com/state1788.html |
|
Abortion Center Director Admits Out-of-State Teens Go There to Avoid
Parents |
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
July 30, 2006
Hagerstown, MD (LifeNews.com) -- When the Senate approved a bill
last week prohibiting taking a teenager to another state for an
abortion without her parents' knowledge or consent, abortion
advocates claimed the practice rarely occurs. However, the director
of a Maryland abortion business says it routinely gets calls from
teens wanting to avoid parental involvement laws. Teenagers in
Pennsylvania's York County are apparently heading to the Hagerstown
Reproductive Health Services abortion business in neighboring
Maryland.
They appear to be wanting to avoid a Pennsylvania state law that
requires parental consent for a minor girl to have an abortion and
requires all women to wait 24 hours to have an abortion after
getting information on fetal development and abortion's medical
risks and alternatives.
The HRHS abortion facility sits just 8-10 miles away from the
Pennsylvania-Maryland border and it regularly advertises in York
County's Yellow Pages.
"It's clear to us that we receive calls from young women in
Pennsylvania who already called a clinic in Pennsylvania, and they
want to circumvent the state laws," the HRHS abortion center
administrator told the York Daily
Record.
Maryland has a parental notification requirement, but the abortion
practitioner is allowed to waive it in most cases. And, unlike
Pennsylvania, Maryland has no mandatory reporting of abortion
figures, so no information is known on how many times Pennsylvania
teens go to Maryland for an
abortion.
Pennsylvania teens are also going to another abortion facility.
Sheryl Wolf, spokeswoman for Hillcrest Clinic, another Maryland
abortion business, said 70 young women came there from Pennsylvania.
Other parts of the country are experiencing the same problems of
teenagers going out of state for abortions.
Missouri teens frequently are taken to the Hope Clinic abortion
facility in Granite City, Illinois, which neighbors St. Louis,
Missouri. Though Missouri requires parental involvement before an
abortion, Illinois does not.
Last year, Shawn Reagan told Missouri state lawmakers about her
problems with the Illinois abortion center.
Reagan said she wept as she talked with staff at Hope Clinic who
refused to let her talk to her 14 year-old daughter who was inside
the facility preparing for an abortion. She was eventually arrested
trying to find her
daughter in the abortion facility.
The girl was reportedly taken to Hope Clinic by the mother of the
man who allegedly impregnated the 14-year-old. The woman, posing as
the girl's grandmother, had the girl called off from school.
When the girl left the abortion facility after having an abortion,
employees told her, "No one will ever know you were here, we'll bury
your records."
Meanwhile, the woman who had taken the girl for the abortion was
slipped out the back door of the abortion facility.
Hope Clinic executive director Sally Burgess told the News-Leader
newspaper that the abortion center does not require parents of
Missouri teens to accompany them to the abortion facility to ensure
it has their consent to
perform the abortion.
According to the National Right to Life Committee, 22 states have
parental consent laws in effect that require a parent to sign off on
a teen's abortion before it can be done. Another seven states have
notification laws
in place that require abortion facilities to notify a parent of a
potential abortion beforehand.
Source:
http://www.lifenews.com/nat2461.html |
|
Abortion foes
cruise city with graphic signs |
|
Graphic signs shout anti-abortion
message
Thursday, July 13, 2006
BY MARY KLAUS
Of The Patriot-News
Whether he gets a thumbs-up,
thumbs-down or other gestures, Kurt Meckes says he makes people think
about abortion as he drives through Harrisburg.
For three weeks, Meckes is driving a
truck displaying 8-by-22-foot images of an aborted fetus.
Four trucks with similar pictures are
in downtown Harrisburg and in nearby municipalities from 10 a.m. to 2
p.m. through July 31. They are part of a campaign by the Center for
Bio-Ethical Reform, an anti-abortion group based in California.
Click here for entire article |
|
Capitolwire: Conference report approved after family-planning funding
impasse resolved. |
HARRISBURG (June 30)
- Lawmakers determined not to have a repeat of last year on a
family-planning funding fight spent most of Saturday negotiating
budget language to avoid that fate this year.
Last year, the General Assembly approved budget language that had been
used since former Gov. Tom Ridge's administration. That language
limits which organizations could get state family-planning funding.
The language had the effect of banning Planned Parenthood and other
groups that performed abortions from getting the funding.
Rendell line-item vetoed the language and Sen. Robert Jubelirer,
R-Blair, and others took him to court. Jubelirer said Rendell had
agreed to the language and then reneged by vetoing the language.
Rendell chief of staff John Estey, a former trial lawyer, disputed
that Rendell made any such agreement. He said he looked forward to
being able to interview legislative leaders under oath about that
issue.
The budget conference committee of legislative leaders was supposed to
meet at 9:30 a.m. Saturday to send the un-amendable budget draft to
the House or Senate.
The hang-up over the family-planning funding was a major factor in the
eight-and-a-half hour delay to that meeting, said House Appropriations
Chairman Brett Feese, R-Lycoming. That meeting took place just after 6
p.m.
The conference committee unanimously approved the budget document.
Speaking of the alleged agreement in last year's budget and Rendell's
veto, Feese said, "Nobody wants to go through that again. So they are
working out compromise language."
At 5:10 p.m., Feese joked "just a few words to go and they'll have an
agreement" on the family-planning language.
Once that snag was erased, Feese said, "we hope the budget will roll."
The ultimate compromise was expected to ensure Planned Parenthood
would get state funding, but Feese said he did not know how that would
be done.
Source: Copyright 2006 GovNetPA, Inc. |
|
Planned Parenthood Does Most US Abortions, Sells 1M Morning After
Pills |
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
June 9, 2006
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- More information is coming forward
from examinations of the annual reports for the Planned Parenthood
Federation of America. The reports show Planned Parenthood continues
to be the leading abortion business in the country -- doing more
abortions than any other company.
As LifeNews.com previously reported, Planned Parenthood
<nat2327.html>, a supposedly nonprofit organization, brought in $882
million in FY 2004-2005 a whopping increase of 8.9 percent over the
previous reporting period. The abortion business made $63 million in
profit last year.
New information shows Planned Parenthood, as of June 2005, had net
assets valued at $784.1 million, of which $302.1 million is
unrestricted. PPFA has another $107.6 million that is temporarily
restricted.
"This is essentially a savings account," Douglas Scott of Life
Decisions International, a watchdog group for corporations that
contribute to Planned Parenthood, explained. "It is money that Planned
Parenthood could choose to spend at any time. But for now it is
sitting drawing interest."
Despite sitting on a huge nest egg of hundreds of millions, the
abortion business is still working overtime to get state and federal
tax dollars. Nearly one-third of its income ($272.7 million)
comes from American taxpayers.
"Despite these huge sums that Planned Parenthood cannot seem to find a
use for, the corporation's hierarchy incessantly claims to need more
tax dollars," Scott said.
The annual report shows Planned Parenthood did 255,015 abortions in
2004 alone (up 4.3% from 2003), generating an estimated $95 million. A
scant 1,414 customers were referred to adoption agencies; down more
than 20% from
2003.
The figures show Planned Parenthood continues to be the largest
abortion business in the United States. In 1984, it did about 5.5
percent of all abortions nationwide, but the figure has increased to
nearly 20 percent as of 2004.
Meanwhile, Planned Parenthood says it has sold 983,537 "emergency"
birth control kits in 2004 (nearly 21.3% more than in 2003). The kits
contain the morning after pill drug, also known as Plan B, which can
sometimes cause an
abortion.
Scott pointed out that the release of the latest annual report was
delayed for six months, compared to the normal release date.
"This is probably because it took a long time for Planned Parenthood
to count so much money," Scott said.
Related web sites: Life Decisions International - <http://www.fightpp.org>
Source: <http://www.lifenews.com/nat2337.html>
|
|
Let's Be
Honest |
6/22/2006
National Catholic Register (www.ncregister.com/)
Language is another casualty of abortion.
Two letter
writers to the print edition of the National Catholic Register
this week ask questions about the Register’s treatment of
abortion in recent reports. In both cases, the confusion arises
because of our culture’s strange way of speaking about abortion.
Click here for entire article
|
|
Articles of
Interest
12/06/06-Incrementalism - A Lie from the Pit of
Hell
09/01/2006-Bush Administration Grants Big Victory
to Abortion Industry
08/31/2006-Crisis in State Government
08/23/2006-Abortion Images Incite Opinion
08/18/2006-Priest for Life Urges Partial-Birth
Abortion Educational Activity
08/14/2006-Pennsylvania Court Backs Rendell Veto
on Family Planning-Abortion Funds
07/30/2006-Abortion Center Director Admits
Out-of-State Teens Go There To Avoid Parents
07/13/2006-Abortion Foes Cruise City with Graphic
Signs
06/30/2006-Capitolwire: Conference Report Approved
After Family-Planning Funding Impasse Resolved
06/9/2006-Planned Parenthood Does Most US Abortions,
Sells 1M Morning After Pills
6/22/2006-Let's Be Honest |